Kia Forum banner

1 - 20 of 41 Posts

·
Registered
2013 Rio5 SX Nav Graphite/Tan
Joined
·
73 Posts
Discussion Starter #1
What is the break in period for a Rio5 SX Nav auto? I am at 3800 km and I have never got more than a little over 400 km per tank. My driving is 50/50 city highway. I know that there was a slight discrepancy on the fuel mileage but this is way off. According to the latest numbers from Kia.ca my car should get 7.1 city and 5.5 highway. The best I have ever seen in my car is 7.7 on the highway. When I fill the tank the computer states that I have about 560km until empty. Whenever I start the car the number plummets from what it states when I turn it off. I have driven complete tanks with both the ECO mode off and on for the entire tank and there is no appreciable difference. Today my fuel light came on at 382km on a tank of gas. I filled up and then drove 49km and now my gauge is just over 3/4. On average my computer hovers around 8.0 regardless if I am on the highway or city streets.

Is anyone else getting this poor mileage? I am not driving hard at all. I am trying to see how much mileage I can get. I traded in my 2006 Focus and I was able to get over 500km per tank without breaking a sweat. Same size gas tank.

I love my car but the mileage sucks. Bad.
 

·
Premium Member
2016 FIAT 500X Trekking Plus AWD; 2016 Kia Forte5 SX 1.6T A/T
Joined
·
6,807 Posts
I would give it no less than 7000 km.

Besides, it depends on many factors - style you drive, gas, weather - now you got pretty cold already, so if you can get average trip fuel economy, try to reset it on hot engine and see what you get.

I am getting my Elantra now about 6.5-7.5 in city - my daily commute to work.
However, when was warmer I never reached 7.0... and I could go as low as 5.5.
Of course in L/100km.
 

·
Registered
Cerato S Hatch Auto
Joined
·
1,236 Posts
It's been stated many times on the forum that you really need to ignore the computer until you are sure that it is accurate.

Economy will only improve slightly after the break-in period. Most of the improvement will be due to changes in driving style. (No more "Gee Whiz" effect).

Only way to get a handle on economy is to test under standard conditions. Do a tank-full on the highway at 100km/h and see how much fuel you use. No hard acceleration, constant speed, known distance etc. etc.

If you are travelling at a fairly constant speed, take a note of the kms covered at each fuel gauge marking, and you will then be able to calibrate the gauge once you know the overall fuel use. e.g. Each division on our KIA fuel gauge is good for 70km on the highway; at 7.1 litres/100km, that's 5 litres per division. This can be confirmed by filling from particular points on the gauge. Also handy to know how much fuel is left when the light comes on (about 6 litres in many cases).
 

·
Registered
2012 Kia Rio SI 1.6L Auto
Joined
·
20 Posts
Unsure on the type of petrol used in Canada. Here in Australia I use 98 Octaine petrol and when i was out on the highway today doing 100kph and using the cruise control I was able to get 5.4Litres per 100ks.

I agree with the other posts that the car needs to be run in

Kiwalian
 

·
Registered
2020 Kia Sorento EX+
Joined
·
393 Posts
Your mileage is similar to what I am getting.... i have attached a spreadsheet of the actual L/100km vs. what the trip computer said. Obviously the trip computer is a bit optimistic...

So while I do agree that this is no "fuel sipper" of a car, it looks like you are getting what you should... You can't use the kia canada fuel numbers as they are not indicative of "real" driving conditions, the USA ones are much closer, and they indicated that you should expect 8.4 city, and 6.5 hwy.

I sit in crazy traffic for about 1.5 hours/day, so I'm actually pretty much right on for city driving. You can see that I did about 4000 km's of highway in the middle of my chart, there I actually beat 6.5 about 6 times! That was flat highway, hardly any wind, cruise set at 100 km/hr.

So it looks like you are likely getting what you should.... I would recommend tracking the actual mileage using an app like roadtrip or something similar to see what you are actually getting (since computer can't be trusted), but from the sounds of your km's driven on a tank, you are pretty in line with what I am getting.

There is no doubt that I was expecting the be getting a super fuel efficient car (which I wouldn't consider 8.4 city to be) but you really can't do all that much better without having a hybrid system, especially for city. I think our highway mileage is actually pretty decent.

edit: you can also see that running the car in, has had little if any effect on the mileage, I am now at 12,000 km's on the odometer.
 

Attachments

·
Registered
2013 Kia Rio Lx 6spd Manual
Joined
·
24 Posts
Minor note - 2006 focus has 14.0 gal gas tank and a Rio has a 11.4 gal gas tank - pretty big difference. At least from all specs I see. So dont pay attention to km per tank, just use real calculations(not computer) to compare the two cars.
 

·
Registered
2012 Kia Rio5 LX mtx
Joined
·
181 Posts
I gave up worrying about fuel efficiency a long time ago...here in the Hill Country, the ups & downs plays hell with mileage. And on long trips (interstate), going 80mph will not get the 40mpg they advertised. I *do* get that going 60-70mph, tho. I will say that the best tankful I've gotten was 399 miles (held just under 12 gallons at fill up).
 

·
Registered
2020 Kia Sorento EX+
Joined
·
393 Posts
Minor note - 2006 focus has 14.0 gal gas tank and a Rio has a 11.4 gal gas tank - pretty big difference. At least from all specs I see. So dont pay attention to km per tank, just use real calculations(not computer) to compare the two cars.
I had a 2001 Ford Focus, on the exact same routes as I now take with my Rio (95% just work and back) over a year, I was averaging 7.8 L/100km, with the Rio under very similar conditions and routes, I am averaging about 8.4 L/100km.
And also of note is that I drive my Rio like a granny in the hopes of getting better mileage, the Focus I drove like a race car pretty much all the time!
So in real comparison, I am certain that the Rio has worse fuel mileage than my 2001 Ford Focus, and very similar power (but the focus was a standard, and rio is automatic, so that could be part of the power since i ran it almost to red-line at pretty much every shift).
 

·
Registered
2012 Rio EX Sedan UVO Auto/Tanzanite blue/tinted windows/Vent visors
Joined
·
313 Posts
David Scoot, looks like we're the same kind of Rio owners: we were promised a very fuel efficient little marvel according to Kia, the dealer and the salesman. We let ourselves be carried away. My Rio is a "little" bit more fuel efficient now that I've added some mileage on it. But it's a long way from being that much FE. As LordHelmet cites in his post, start with these numbers: 8.4 city, and 6.5 hwy. They are much closer to reality. At least to my experience. Even with the new Kia/Hyundai numbers, 8.4 city, and 6.5 hwy are closer to what you will get with your Rio. It's a bit of disappointment to customers like me who were after a fuel efficient car and gave in to Kia advertisement but at least you own a little beauty and one which is packed with latest technology. If I may make a suggestion: rewind and picture yourself in the second or third car of your choice when you were shopping for a new car. Now, would you rather drive, let's say, a Fiesta or a Mazda 2 or a Honda Fit, for 1-3 Liters more/Km. This is the only viable way I found not to be in a perpetual state of disappointment vis-à-vis Kia concerning FE. And take the credit card Kia is sending to you...In a nutshell: wonderful piece of technology, superb styling, comfort and fulll equipped (specially your SX. Miss the heating steering) and smile in your face.
Enjoy your SX, lucky man.
 

·
Premium Member
2016 FIAT 500X Trekking Plus AWD; 2016 Kia Forte5 SX 1.6T A/T
Joined
·
6,807 Posts
it ALL depends HOW you drive it.

I get 40-33 MPG (5.9-7.1 L/100 km) from my Elantra 2.0 L, 5 spd which is rated 33-25 MPG US (7.1-9.4). So should I complain that my car does not drink enough?

Get a ScanGauge or something similar to measure instantaneous fuel use and monitor it, and learn how to drive it.


For a comparison.
Another car we have is 2007 Rondo V6, 5spd A/T.
I get 30 MPG US (7.8) on highway, 20-25 (11.8-9.4) city which is rated 18-25 MPG US (13.1-9.4 L/100km).
My wife, on the other hand - gets 27 on highway (8.7) and 16-21 in city (14.7-11.2 L/100km)

So? Same cars, same conditions, BUT different drivers, and different STYLES.
 

·
Registered
2013 Rio SX Hatchback
Joined
·
417 Posts
So should I complain that my car does not drink enough?
Yes, yes you should. (dumb answer to a dumb question)

We all know that driving style affects mileage. However you shouldn't have to baby a car to get close to the stated mileage. I drive my car. I don't drive it hard and I don't feather the pedal either. I just drive like I have every other car for the last 35 years. My mileage has gotten WORSE since new. I was getting 8 - 9 L/100km combined (but mostly city) when new, and now am regularly getting 10 - 11 L/100km. My driving style HASN'T CHANGED. Same driver, same car, same conditions, worsening mileage.

I love my Rio. But one of my major purchase decision factors was fuel economy. I knew I wouldn't get the stated mileage, but I'm not even in the same ballpark at this point.

And for the record....I HAVE tried driving like a granny using ECO mode and still don't achieve the rated mileage.
 

·
Registered
2013 Kia Rio 5 SX UVO, 2012 Cadillac Escalade Ultra Luxury
Joined
·
116 Posts
You realistically also will NOT get better mpgs than the manual states, unless you have done some engine upgrades to increase power at the same load.
 

·
Registered
2016 Sorento SX V6, Regency Red, Built in Georgia March 16, 2016 - Bought it April 28th, 2016
Joined
·
462 Posts
My mileage has gotten WORSE since new. I was getting 8 - 9 L/100km combined (but mostly city) when new, and now am regularly getting 10 - 11 L/100km. My driving style HASN'T CHANGED. Same driver, same car, same conditions, worsening mileage.
Winter gas could explain it - yes, even for Surrey. Less energy per liter for the winter blend.
 

·
Registered
'13 Rio5 // LX Clear White w/ Pwr Pkg
Joined
·
83 Posts
All I know is that I'm getting way better mileage than I did in my Subaru WRX Wagon, avg'ed 20.5 per gallon in that thing. My Rio5 has averaged 32mpg so far. :)
 

·
Registered
2012 Rio EX Sedan UVO Auto/Tanzanite blue/tinted windows/Vent visors
Joined
·
313 Posts
We all know that driving style affects mileage. However you shouldn't have to baby a car to get close to the stated mileage. I drive my car. I don't drive it hard and I don't feather the pedal either.

And for the record....I HAVE tried driving like a granny using ECO mode and still don't achieve the rated mileage.
My own experience: you HAVE to baby this car to get close to the stated mileage. That's what I did this summer: feather foot, grandma driving style and all and I did get better mileage. Zero driving fun. Forget about following the traffic. Forget about the center lane. Stay in right. Don't drive over 90km/h. Don't use AC, don't even think about opening the windows and don't dare touching the sunroof button. But then you get interesting mileage. Marleyfan you said it: baby this car. I add: drive like a grand grandma and the numbers are there. Kia is right. If you like that kind of driving...
 

·
Registered
2012 Black Kia Rio5 SX w/ Nav, 2005 Honda Odyssey EX
Joined
·
190 Posts
Here are my stats over the last 12 fill-ups (2 months, give or take). These were determined using the odometer between fill-ups and not using the on-board computer or trip tracker. I've been driving the car since April, 2012.

General Information:
Code:
Car Model:       2012 Kia Rio 5-door Hatchback SX with NAV
Last Odometer:   17,352 km
Tank Capacity:   43.2 L
Driving Mode:    Eco (with lots of manual)
Distance/day:    79 km
Predicted Range: 534 km
Total Distance:  4,877 km
Total Time:      2 months, 1 day
Mileage History:
Code:
Avg L/100:       8.094
Max L/100:       8.616
Min L/100:       7.682
Last L/100:      8.257
Avg $/L:        $1.338
Min $/L:        $1.269
Max $/L:        $1.464
Last $/L:       $1.299
$'s/km:         $0.108
$'s/fillup:     $47.96
$'s/day:         $9.28
Km's/$:           9.23
L's/fillup:      35.85
Days/fillup:       6.0
Km's/fillup:    443.38
Total L's:      430.21
Total Records:      12
Total $'s:     $575.53
Food for thought ...
 

·
Registered
2012 Black Kia Rio5 SX w/ Nav, 2005 Honda Odyssey EX
Joined
·
190 Posts
BTW, the reason I posted my stats is as context for my question. How many liters are you filling up every time? In my case, I fill up on average 35 L. Therefore, my distance is based on that many L's, not over the full tank.
 

·
Registered
2012 Black Kia Rio5 SX w/ Nav, 2005 Honda Odyssey EX
Joined
·
190 Posts
@Rosscofat, I assume your comment it to the OP. If it is directed to me, I don't sweat it at all. I am having a great time driving my car and customizing it. The stats are driven by my analytical half and good information for enquiring minds. ;)
 
1 - 20 of 41 Posts
Top