Brian,
I really can't understand your stubbornness on this because of something you read on the internet. I'm telling you as an ex warranty specialist working at both domestic and foreign OEMs, there is no basis (i.e., legal) for denying warranty claims on documented service (either conducted via an authorized dealer, independent, or owner). I'm not "thinking" this, I'm empirically stating this as a truth (just go and read your Kia Warranty book and stop using Google and stop believing everything you read on the inter-webs).
I don't think that Brian is claiming that the consumer won't prevail in the end - the law is the law - but rather, that the consumer may get seriously jerked around by a manufacturer before achieving a just result.
Having watched this and the Hyundai forum for a number of years, there seems to be quite a difference in customer service north vs. south of the 49th parallel. On the whole, we have seen much less cooperation from dealers and corporate offices in Canada. As I noted in my earlier post, I would not be the least surprised if that one anecdotal report came from someone in Canada. Sadly, it sounds about typical. When reading these stories, it is very important to first ask where the author IS.
While we see very few issues with Magnuson-Moss here, there is no
direct analogue in Canada -- it's a province by province thing with individual Consumer Protection Acts and a national Canadian Competition Act. Thanks to the latter, "Tied Selling" isn't legal there, either, but it doesn't mean that there isn't more resistance under the various Consumer Protection Acts to accepting the supplied documentation from the owner.