Has Kia lost the plot with the new Ceed? - Kia Forum
Kia Forum Kia Forum Header Right
Kia-Forums.com is owned and operated by AutoForums.com, Inc. Kia-Forums.com is an enthusiast website dedicated to the discussion of Kia Vehicles, Kia Family Cars and Kia SUVs. Kia-Forums.com is completely unofficial and is not endorsed in any way by KIA Motor Corp, its affiliates, or its subsidiaries. KIA® is a registered trademark of KIA Motors Corp. in Canada, the United States, and in other countries around the world. No challenge to the status of KIA®'s registered trademarks is intended.


» Auto Insurance
» Featured Product
» Wheel & Tire Center

Go Back   Kia Forum > KIA Models > Kia Cee'd Forum
Register Home Forum Active Topics Photo Gallery Garage Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Auto EscrowAuto Loans

Kia-Forums.com is the premier Kia Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-05-2012, 05:46 PM   #1 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Spencernj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: France, Pas-de-Calais
Posts: 263
Drives: Kia Ceed, MGTF, Various Jeeps new and old, FIAT 500
Gallery: 0
Default Has Kia lost the plot with the new Ceed?

I am not convinced I would buy a new Ceed it seems far too expensive. Here in France a new Ceed Style 1.6 Diesel (similar to a UK 2) costs 22,000 euro. (At current exchange rate this make the French version slightly cheaper than a UK 2, as 22k euro is £17,741 against a UK price of £18,295.)

While its is a nice car for 19,000 euro I can get a top of the range Dacia Duster 4x4 Diesel Laurette model (The Duster is France's 5th best selling car) with a higher spec and Leather which is based in the same chassis and engine as a Nissan Juke but is a bigger car. For 2,000 euro less than the Kia I can get a similar spec Seat Leon or for the same price a higher spec Citroen C4. In my view the Seat and the Citroen are more desirable vehicles. Here in France Ceed at Active/2 level has gone up 5,000 euro (about 22%) from the new to the old and that's too much.
__________________
Cars: 2011 Kia Ceed CRDi EcoDynamics; 2010 Fiat 500 Lounge 1.2: Various Jeeps new and old. https://www.facebook.com/Neil.SpencerJones
Spencernj is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 12-06-2012, 01:35 AM   #2 (permalink)
Full Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 172
Gallery: 0
Default

I have looked at the new Ceed SW in the showroom and was well impressed. It has risen in price from when we bought ours 2 1/2 years ago but the spec has increased substantially, we bought a "3" spec but if I bought today it would be a "2". OTR retail it would be about £1400 more than we paid in 2010 which is not a huge increase from old to new model. OK we would loose a few bits but we would gain quite a few as well, looks pretty even to me.

The alternatives would be the Focus, Astra, Golf, etc etc. They are all smaller and more expensive.

So its not cheap but it still looks like the best buy on paper.

But as always its not the price on the windscreen that matters, its the size of the cheque I need to write and how sharp the dealers pencil is.
Ceed3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2012, 03:07 AM   #3 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Spencernj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: France, Pas-de-Calais
Posts: 263
Drives: Kia Ceed, MGTF, Various Jeeps new and old, FIAT 500
Gallery: 0
Default

I agree that cost to change is the real figure rather than the sticker price. One of the good things in the UK is dealer discount. In France that is generally none existent. On the upside depreciation is a *lot* lower making 2nd hand cars much dearer.

Sent from my ZTE-BLADE using AutoGuide App
__________________
Cars: 2011 Kia Ceed CRDi EcoDynamics; 2010 Fiat 500 Lounge 1.2: Various Jeeps new and old. https://www.facebook.com/Neil.SpencerJones
Spencernj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2012, 03:20 AM   #4 (permalink)
Full Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Croatia, Zagreb
Posts: 141
Drives: Pro Ceed 1.6 Crdi Challenge
Gallery: 0
Default

And in C4 and Leon is better engine
Knorac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2012, 04:33 AM   #5 (permalink)
Full Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 139
Gallery: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ceed3 View Post

But as always its not the price on the windscreen that matters, its the size of the cheque I need to write and how sharp the dealers pencil is.
Correct. When we bought ours we looked at getting another Focus Estate since we had been satisfied with the existing one. Problem was it was a bit small in the back seats and the boot lacked space as well. We looked at getting a Mondeo Estate, huge we thought until we looked at the Ceed SW. The Ceed SW had as much luggage space as the Mondeo (way more than the Focus) plus more rear seat space than the Focus (not as much as the Mondeo which was limousine like but over the top in reality). The price of the Focus 1.6 TDCi Titanium was £2000 more than the Ceed SW 3 but the Ceed was better specced, had a 6 speed box and more power (it drove like it had for more than the 5bhp quoted). Ford was giving huge discounts of course but the price to swap was virtually the same, no contest. Just looked at Parkers and they are worth vitually the same as a trade in.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Knorac View Post

And in C4 and Leon is better engine
Disagree there I am afraid. The C4 engine is the same as the Focus, a good engine but the 1.6 CRDi in the Ceed is better. Had the Focus for 5 years thus have a direct comparison. With regards to the Seat the 1.6 diesel is a slug, an economical slug though, the 1.9 is a noisy slug but the 2.0 is a cracker, more expensive and in a totally different class (to be fair I drove them in the Skoda Octavia and not a Seat but they are identical).
seven7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2012, 06:43 AM   #6 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Spencernj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: France, Pas-de-Calais
Posts: 263
Drives: Kia Ceed, MGTF, Various Jeeps new and old, FIAT 500
Gallery: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by seven7 View Post



Disagree there I am afraid. The C4 engine is the same as the Focus, a good engine but the 1.6 CRDi in the Ceed is better. Had the Focus for 5 years thus have a direct comparison. With regards to the Seat the 1.6 diesel is a slug, an economical slug though, the 1.9 is a noisy slug but the 2.0 is a cracker, more expensive and in a totally different class (to be fair I drove them in the Skoda Octavia and not a Seat but they are identical).
Agree on the Citroen engine the PSA/Ford diesels aren't bad but do seem to wear more than the Kia ones and get more rattly and noisy quite quickly. The VW Group engines in the Seat are bullet-proof though. When did you try one as VW revised their engines about two years ago and moved from the PD engine which used a low pressure common rail to a proper Common Rail version. The PD engine was noisy because of the cam actuated injectors.
__________________
Cars: 2011 Kia Ceed CRDi EcoDynamics; 2010 Fiat 500 Lounge 1.2: Various Jeeps new and old. https://www.facebook.com/Neil.SpencerJones
Spencernj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2012, 07:05 AM   #7 (permalink)
Expert
 
dubster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: UK! Tunbridge Wells & Rochester
Posts: 825
Drives: RIP :( 2010 Pro_Cee'd - Infra Red 2
Gallery: 0
Garage
Default

Had a brand new Seat Altea with 1.6TDi engine for 2 weeks last month, initially felt more powerful than our 89hp 1.4 Pro, but actually it was about the same.
All the power was delivered between 1500 & 2200 RPM, thus it ran outta steam almost instantly, and outside that very small range it was utter pants.

Ok so it managed 48mpg over the 2 weeks on my country lane commute, which isn't bad but way off the quoted 56mpg urban consumption.
__________________
If in doubt, Accelerate!
dubster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2012, 07:30 AM   #8 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Spencernj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: France, Pas-de-Calais
Posts: 263
Drives: Kia Ceed, MGTF, Various Jeeps new and old, FIAT 500
Gallery: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dubster View Post
Had a brand new Seat Altea with 1.6TDi engine for 2 weeks last month, initially felt more powerful than our 89hp 1.4 Pro, but actually it was about the same.
All the power was delivered between 1500 & 2200 RPM, thus it ran outta steam almost instantly, and outside that very small range it was utter pants.

Ok so it managed 48mpg over the 2 weeks on my country lane commute, which isn't bad but way off the quoted 56mpg urban consumption.
Dubster was that your 1st Diesel? The power band issue is pretty typical of most diesel engines,even turbos. They are pretty useless above 3000. The opposite of modern small petrol engines which need a good rev. You get used to changing up early and using all the torque.
__________________
Cars: 2011 Kia Ceed CRDi EcoDynamics; 2010 Fiat 500 Lounge 1.2: Various Jeeps new and old. https://www.facebook.com/Neil.SpencerJones
Spencernj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2012, 07:38 AM   #9 (permalink)
Full Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 139
Gallery: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Spencernj View Post
Agree on the Citroen engine the PSA/Ford diesels aren't bad but do seem to wear more than the Kia ones and get more rattly and noisy quite quickly. The VW Group engines in the Seat are bullet-proof though. When did you try one as VW revised their engines about two years ago and moved from the PD engine which used a low pressure common rail to a proper Common Rail version. The PD engine was noisy because of the cam actuated injectors.
We tried them about 2 1/2 years ago. The 1.6 and 2 litre were both common rail but not sure about the 1.9, cannot remember why we drove it to be honest, Noah had the same block as a back up motor in the Ark, fine back then but things have moved on a huge amount.

Dubster is spot on with his description of the power delivery, forgotten about that. Seem to remember it came in with a bang at about 1800 rpm and died instantly you reached 3500 rpm. Exactly like our old TDi in the 90's which was OK then but as I said above, things have moved on a lot.

STOP PRESS. Just remembered why we drove the 1.9 TDi, it was the same price as the 1.6 TDi which was dire, we hoped it would be somewhere between the 1.6 and 2.0, we were wrong.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Spencernj View Post

Dubster was that your 1st Diesel? The power band issue is pretty typical of most diesel engines,even turbos. They are pretty useless above 3000. The opposite of modern small petrol engines which need a good rev. You get used to changing up early and using all the torque.
Disagree there. Our Ceed does not become useless at just above 3000 rpm. When you are overtaking it pulls well above 4000 rpm without the performance dropping off, the Focus was pretty much the same to be honest.

Last edited by seven7; 12-06-2012 at 07:46 AM.
seven7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2012, 06:19 PM   #10 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Spencernj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: France, Pas-de-Calais
Posts: 263
Drives: Kia Ceed, MGTF, Various Jeeps new and old, FIAT 500
Gallery: 0
Default

The 1.9 will definitely be the PD engine as will the 1.6 at that time. They weren't bad but the cam actuated injectors on the PD system made them noisy. The PD (Pompe Deuce I think it means) system was made by Bosch & fitted to these VW diesels about 2003/4 to meet emission standards and reduced the power of the engine and torque. They were better before. The PD engines were called Common Rail but weren't CR as we know it. It was never as good a system as proper electrical actuated injectors but was cheaper. It was dropped in 2010 again due to new emissions standards. You are right about the 2.0 its a cracking engine Jeep used the 140bhp version in the Patriot until recently. The post 2010 VW 1.6 is a different engine AFAIK.

Sent from my ZTE-BLADE using AutoGuide App
__________________
Cars: 2011 Kia Ceed CRDi EcoDynamics; 2010 Fiat 500 Lounge 1.2: Various Jeeps new and old. https://www.facebook.com/Neil.SpencerJones
Spencernj is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

  Kia Forum > KIA Models > Kia Cee'd Forum


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.2

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:32 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2
Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.